wp349d1230.png
wp860d38ab.png
wp2ef41518.png
wpf8d87f7d.png
wpbe70cd5d.png
wpeae2881d.png
wp8f368e71.png
wp0df1ea5f.png
wpbd68fc66.png

© Inre International

wp7565d6d0.png
wpd3ad17e9_0f.jpg
wpb7f320ef_0f.jpg
Bill Boyd’s
wp44940bf4.png

Finding the right fit

To find characters which will be compatible in teams, firms often make use of psychometric tests such as Myers-Briggs or 16PF. Going one step further is Belbin’s Interplace test which identifies actual team roles members are most likely to play. According to research, pioneered by Dr. Meredith Belbin there are 9 common team roles or types:

Co-ordinator

mature, balanced, conservative good as a chair person; "what do you think?"

Plant

clever, innovative,creative, unorthodox; "how about?..."

Shaper

dynamic, great drivers; but may force through their view; "let's do it this way"

Implementer

practical organiser,defines tasks, provides logical path; "What does this mean in practice?"

Resource Investigator

extrovert, outgoing, networker; " I know a man who..."

Monitor-Evaluator

serious, strategic, the thinker of the team; "what's the implication?"

Teamworker

mild, perceptive, accommodating, reliable; "what can I do to help?"

Completer-Finisher

painstaking, careful, conscientious; "It needs to be done properly"

Specialist

single-minded, self-starter, dedicated; "I'll do what I'm good at"

Most people are combinations of the above, though usually with one or two types more dominant. Ideally all types should be present to give the best balance. Be warned, a team with too few types could spell trouble.

  • too many plants and shapers and no completer-finishers, for example can give great ideas with no result
  • no teamworkers can mean no glue to pull the team together
  • too many co-rdinators and no plants can produce conservative rather than creative results

To find out more about Belbin team roles visit Belbin Associates

wp0df1ea5f.png
wpbd68fc66.png